Where are you in the cycle?

February 23, 2014 Off

An organism possessing a rational mind who can see the dualism (ie. good vs bad, male vs. female, before vs. after etc.), is in a privileged position to discover "something" profound. I am keeping this "something" deliberately cryptic and keeping it to be discovered by yourself, if you dare! But I will talk about the people/organisms/beings who are searching for it and how much they can discover. The types of organisms who can potentially have this dualistic rational mind include:

1. Human/Transhumans [H+]
2. Future Humanoids from Chimps and Monkeys, if earth survives that long enough and if humans are generous enough to allowed such instead of trying to make them slaves.
3. Atlantians or Hyperboreans
4. Olympian, Celtic, Druidic, Hindu, Chinese, Arabian, Persian, Aryan, Aztec or other mythical beings
5. Extraterrestrial/Pleiadians/Annunakis/Alien intelligence
6. Sumerian/Egyptian/Canaanite/Phoenician/Semitic mythical creatures
7. Any other conceivable physical, intelligent organisms anywhere in the universe with a rational mind.

What is this thing that these organisms can discover? This thing is the thing that you already know but do not understand, hence you are looking for it. In contrast, the things you don't know absolutely you can not even imagine it and will not know it ever, most likely because it does not exist. If you know something and understand it completely, you are not interested in and hence not looking for it. What does the organism, who are possessing a rational mind, know and hence trying to understand and searching for it? What is the Grandest thing they can discover? Please note that I did not used the word invention, because there is nothing to invent here. The thing or Truth always existed, but when you find it, you call it discovery. Invention is, in one sense, still discovery because it is mere permutation and recombination of things assembled in such a way that it looks brand new but the raw materials or energies always existed to begin with.

Based on the extent of the journey and how much they understand what they already know, these organisms can be categorized as following:  [Note, it's not a strict category. It's just a continuous gradation for the purpose of understanding. One person can be at different phases at different points of times depending on his effort and sincerity. The same organism can be at different phases at the same time too!]

1. NonCyclers: 
These are ordinary law abiding citizens. They are consumed by their mundane task of feeding and proliferating themselves. They are very docile, dependent on authority because they cannot think for themselves. Their main concern is food, sex, health, safety and pleasure. To have all of these, all they need is some money and their chief motivation of life to earn money. Typically they take pleasure from TV, sex, booze, footballs etc. Occasionally, they build up social bonding with their family and immediate neighbor, but they are afraid to make relation with outsiders. They are afraid of anything new and unorthodox. They abide by the prevalent religion or social customs and they have no questions in their life to ask, because everything can be asked is already answered for them by scientist, religious leaders, government or some sorts of authorities. They live a happy life and dies. Nobody will ever remember them again just after two generations, and even within these two generations, only family members will occasionally remember them, often with despise. They work in the assembly lines of productions which will be used by subsequent strata. Back in the old days they were called gentiles but now they are called good, law abiding citizens.



2. QuarterCyclers:
This group arises out of the awareness of the fact that there is more to life than what the NonCyclers are doing. They try to understand the world. They feel that they can do better. They start the famous "Hero's Journey" but without knowing what they exactly want. They learned some techniques that they are good at, trained themselves in colleges and universities. They achieved some confidence, self esteem and learned how to respect others and be respected by significant others. Out of their intrinsic abilities, they might pursue a very different paths. Some of them becomes painter, artist, actor/actress, musician, novelist ect. The practitioners of this arts track make themselves believe that they are satisfied in their life and tries to become content. They find their purpose of life in arts and by expressing what they do, they are trying to satisfy their inner impulses of creativity. However, at the end, they remain unsatisfied, although skillfully pretending not to, out of their self-esteem and feigned confidence and to protect themselves from cognitive dissonance. Out of this dissatisfaction, gradually they becomes more and more impulsive and started to degenerate, which is manifested as sexual experimentation, celebrity craze, drug uses, suicides, or utter renunciation of arts profession altogether. Those who perceive arts as not a good way to express their creativity, follows the science track. They are concretely rational, logical, mathematical in their thinking and works. Ebullient with enthusiasm, they try to do real science, discover useful things that the potential to serve the humanity well but near the end, they have an eerie sense of incompleteness in their task and if they are honest with themselves, many will regret that they have spent their whole life chasing a ghost! Like other humans, a scientist's soul yearns for the truth, but with contemporary science, all you can do is to check what are the things which are not true ["falsification" theory put forwards by Karl Popper]. Additionally, they will see many of their original scientific works are being commercialized and now being used by the corporations and politicians against their original intentions. The humanity will remember them for a longer time for their good task but they themselves are not happy and have a vague feelings that they have wasted their own lives, chasing a goal which they never achieved, never suspected that most of their goals were not genuinely self-created, rather, those goals were imposed or injected by the society for its mundane needs. Seeing the utter uselessness of arts and science for their own lives, the smart, charismatic, pragmatic ones decide to build a better society by controlling the lower strata and becomes a politicians or in more extreme case revolutionaries. They use scientist, artist, music, TV and media as his tools to impress the NonCyclers and simultaneously carefully suppress the sciences that can become an inconvenience for them to achieve their goals. They will eliminate anybody who is not in agreement of their "vision" and wage ideological or military war in home or abroad. Once they have achieved their "vision", slowly but surely, in their own lifetime or down the road when they are watching it from their graves, they will come to realize that, no matter how good and original their intention or vision was, the ideology or political structure degenerates and becomes a new monstrosity to oppress the meek. To their dismay, they are either assassinated by the same people for which they devoted their life to or see the horror of the monster that they have created and then repents for their mistakes but without any hope of redemption. Seeing the disharmony in the world, once in a while there comes some revolutionary anarchist who tries to undo the harm, but is doing so they are creating more harm than ever before! And finally seeing the all these mess, the remaining of the people who are helpless but wise becomes depressed and start medicating himself by drugs, smoking or some real medications. In some cases, the wise depressed starts to write and becomes world renown critics, novelist, poets etc. The humanity remembers them for even longer time for their excellent works but they themselves are depressed, unhappy, becomes more and more isolated and dies miserably.

3. HalfCyclers:
Those people who are brilliant enough to see the fallacy of the QuarterCyclers's thinking and way of pursuing life, start to examine everything very carefully. They start to dissect the assumptions that lead to the demise of QuarterCyclers. They study logic, mathematics and science carefully not to fall in the same trap that scientist, revolutionaries, politicians fell. After deep contemplation, they find the hidden assumptions behind those disciplines and the causes of the futility of such efforts. They found the real problem of all of these are linked with their own existence. For example, if there is an effect, there must be a cause behind it. Only the scientist or statistician will call it a chance. He is wise enough to see the weakness to all of these reasoning and finally reaching a point when he can see the irreconcilable dilemma. People cannot tolerate gaps in their thoughts, technically know as cognitive dissonance. They have to take a side. Most of the cases, their mind cannot operate without filling the gaps in their thoughts. To fill up the gap, they have to take some kind of  actions. Those who are more rationally minded fills the gap with a "leap of faith" and becomes the Fidels. This includes Church high fathers, Popes, Muslim caliphate or mullah, or High Priest of other religions who often act as a backbone for the society including for the politicians, or governments. Those who are more empirically minded refuse to fill the gap for lack of evidence, becomes agnostic or atheist, who often act as a backbone for scientist. Together, this group always creates the establishment and some eminent members of this class or their direct disciples become the presidents or the rulers of the lands. They strive to solve the unsolvable problems of the nations but at the end always fail to establish the promised "kingdom of haven" on earth. In either way, they are trying to handle the gaps of their knowledgebility but cannot overcome it. The disciple of the either schools [Fidels or Infidels] with sufficient moral, ethical and rational power becomes philosophers who exert a even longer lasting influence on humanity. Despite all these, deep inside they are still anxious about the gap that they have connected by faith or non faith, and hence at unease. To compensate that uneasiness, they work even harder, pray even harder, or do experiments even harder without finding any way to eliminate it completely and remains uncomfortable till the end.

4. FullCyclers: 
By some mysterious ways, some people came to realize completely what they were originally looking for. Frequently they use the term "Divine Grace" by which they have found the true mystery of existence without any gaps in their Knowledge. This group includes Prophets, Mystics, Buddhas, Grand Sufis, true Seeers, Esotericist, Occultist and the true Enlightened one. These people understand the things that they know without any shadow of doubts and hence completely content and satisfied. They are completely aligned with nature and its harmony. They typically try to communicate, although their language is mostly incomprehensible for the rest. The rest of the people know that whatever the FullCyclers are saying must be true but they do not just get it completely. They becomes confused, often infuriated. Out of envy and insecurity of QuarterCyclers or HalfCyclers, the FullCyclers often get killed, because QuarterCyclers and HalfCyclers have been searching for the same thing for their whole life without success and these FullCyclers are creating an immediate threat to their establishment. After killing them, they make themselves the true disciple of the FullCyclers and propagate a new religion or scientific discipline roughly based on their teachings that will only strengthen their own preexisting establishments. In some rare cases, some FullCyclers avoided death miraculously and lived a completely happy, illustrious life. In either ways, these FullCyclers emerge as the prototypical role models and becomes the immutable, everlasting original "archetype of the archetype" of life for the whole humanity.

5. MultiCyclers: 
There are some FullCyclers who travels the cycle of life several times and becomes the MultiCyclers. As you can expect, this group is extremely rare to find but have a profound and sustained indirect effect on humanity. These MultiCyclers are impossible to recognize unless you are a FullCycler or MultiCycler. They seems to be a regular law abiding citizens, just like NonCyclers, but  are silent and hermetic in nature. They never communicate their Knowledge. These are the hidden masters scattered among all the Cyclers (ie. Farmers, Shepherds, Workers, Poets, Travelers, Writers, Journalist, Parents, Philosophers, Humanitarians, Physicians, Scientist, Mystics, Janitor, Homeless, you name it) who are supporting and nurturing the humanity, preventing it's own collapse despite all the mess that the rest have created. They are acting literally like the "Atlas" who is holding the world on their shoulder! In exchange of theses great services, they don't even want any credit or recognition because they they know what they are doing and why they are doing. Most of the works of theses individual MultiCyclers are then taken under the brand name of "Scienctific-Industrial-Religiopoliticomilitary Complex" operated and orchestrated by the HalfCyclers for their own benefits. Those MultiCyclers know Everything and Nothing and hence they are silent. Their lips of wisdom is closed excepts for those with understanding. A MultiCycler's life might look like the following picture and as you can see, technically they can be found anywhere in the circle, intermingled with any Cycler, but in silence.




Let me finish this article by asking a rhetoric question: In what phase of the life cycle are you currently in?

You cannot know something that you don't already know.

February 20, 2014 Off

If you know something and understand it, you are not interested in looking for it, because you already got it completely. What you don't know, by definition you cannot even imagine and search for it, because it resides in some dimension that is either nonexistent or you don't have any access to it, yet. But when you already know something but you don't remember how, hence you don't understand it, in those situations, you delude yourself by saying "I want to know". No, no, no. Whenever you say you want to know, actually you already know it. When you say I want to know this or that, actually you are just trying to understand it. The "what" is the thing that you already know, but you are trying to find the "why" and "how". 

From your everyday life you can tell that whatever you know about something in your day-to-day events, situations, skills, memory, knowledge about any particular event, you realize that you know that because you were involved in it. Either you practiced it to learn that technical skills, you watched the event, you talked with someone about something, you participated in some activity, you dreamed something but cannot remember it clearly, you tasted something, you smelled something, you heard something, you thought something, you tried something, you read something and most commonly you or somebody else you know did some mistakes. That's how you can recognize and reflect about those knowledge. But there are other knowledge that seems to inherent to us, for what we conveniently deluded ourselves by believing "that knowledge" is just innate and that's how we were made. No, no, no. Nothing defies causality and nothing comes out magically out of nowhere. What are the anterior phenomenons operating behind this "innateness"? Unfortunately, we have just taken this "innateness" for granted, which is actually a placeholder term, quite idiotically. Alternatively, there are some misguided people who will still preach you to believe that human mind is a "tabula rasa". Oh fool! they don't have the slightest clue. There is no point of talking about those uninitiated minds and their self deceiving beliefs. The matter of fact that there are many "innate" knowledge and we are trying to understand it. To our dismay, this passive acceptance of "unexplainable" nature of the "innate" knowledge is acting as the greatest barrier for Gnosis. To overcome this barrier, you have to find out how you know something, or feel something without apparent awareness of participation to those events responsible for those innate knowledge. For example, what is the source of seeking attention? What is the source of seeking approval? Where does the concept of love come from? What is the source of the knowledge that enable our pattern recognition? What is the source of the knowledge of time? What is the source of the knowledge of cause and effect? Where does the knowledge of language come from? Don't just answer like a parrot saying "It's innate. It's innate. That's all we know!"

Were you there and participated when those "innate" knowledge was developing? Can you remember those times? Was your brain also there at that time when those event was in there incipient stage? If your brain was not there then how come you can have those knowledge that you called innate? As I mentioned above, you cannot have a knowledge unless you were somehow involved. Don't just give me the answer such as "Oh that thing! I born with those innate abilities". Think, and think hard. I am assuming you already straightened up your thinking skill by recommended thought training. If not, please read the essay titled "How valid is your thinking". Think using everything, not just by using your brain. After all your brain was not there in those primitive time and hence conventional logic is useless to handle this magnificent task.

You can start thinking from "Young's Double Slit Experiment". Although most of the physicist, including some Nobel laureates will tell you that nobody understands Double Slit Experiment, but in order to understand the source of your knowledge in the "lingo of science" you have to understand the true meaning of that experiment. Think sequentially like a photon, a particle, atom and then molecule. Think like water, rock, plant and then animal. Then think using whole human body with all its constituent elements and cells including those of your ancestors. Please notice, thinking from these levels, you cannot use logic and premises which is a product of your brain. You have to think beyond logic. Seems impossible? Do your homework and meditation. Then you will know how to use your imaginations and traces of occult memories imprinted on those primitive forms. Lastly think conventionally starting from the enteric nervous system. Then think from spinal cords and then brain stem. Then go up and think from limbic brain including pineal gland. Then go to next higher thinking apparatus of striatum, right hemisphere, left hemisphere, hippocampus and lastly prefrontal neocortex. If you can access and extract memories from all of those levels then you will see where does the innate knowledge comes from and how this knowledge exist as of now. Don't expect to achieve this level of knowledge after spending just an hour or so. What ever you genuinely achieved in your life, it takes time. For example, if you want to have a baby and raise him as your dream son, it takes time and genuine efforts of some 10, 15 or 20 years. How can you even imagine to achieve the greatest task of the whole creation itself will come to you so easy. Remember, there is no shortcuts. Only after the greatest endeavor of your life you will understand it. Time and efforts needed varies from 5 to 50 years or more, of sincere, continuous contemplation but the good news is, it's never late! This will take you to your original goal of understanding something that you already knew. And this will sooth your mind permanently and you will not ever be lost again.

Logic: strength and weakness

February 17, 2014 Off

Logic, the most powerful tool you have, if used correctly, is absolutely reliable, but only if your starting assumption is also absolutely correct. Because it's very very hard to find an indisputable ground or assumption from which you can build up logical chain of thoughts, logic can and will lead you to wrong conclusions. The only weakness of logic I can see is its dependence on premise. Otherwise logic, if used methodically, is as good as it can get. 

When your premise start from intuition rather than logic per se, then your logic will dependent on your intuition. If you have a correct intuition then your logico-intuition is as good as it can be. Intuition is such a thing that you can not cultivate, but it can only be recognized. Why? Because intuition comes from the pre-conscious region of the kingdom of Freudian/Jungian unconscious. You can be only aware of intuition but you cannot see where and how it is coming from, unless you have some special access to your unconscious. All intuition is already there and there is nothing more you can cultivate or concoct. The only thing you can do or have to do is to recognize the nature of the situation. If everything that happened is buried inside the intuition, if intuition already knows the staff, and lastly if any conclusion you draw is dependent of intuition then what is the point of thinking or using logic? This is the grand bug in the system that you have to deal with. You have a infinity degree of freedom to find out the mystery of this bug. To find the answer of this problem, again you have to go back to your intuition. No matter how dramatic is the suggestion of the intuition, you have to accept it unless you can find a better one. My answer, with my best intuition recognition and logical training, is as following: 

An example of logical power: 1➡4 
1. I have the free will, therefore, free will itself signifies its exist. 
2. Something cannot come out of nothing. (If the scientists claim that we came out of nothing then I would say that "nothing" is still a "thing" that they don't understand). 
3. I am, therefore, Creator was. 
4. Creator was, and I am still here, therefore Creator is. 

This is just an example of logic but it still has some implicit intuition embedded deep inside, hence difficult to see. Things are not as simple as you might think. The real, deep mystery of the existence can be summarized as following: 

You already have the answer of your existence (from Unconscious ➡Intuition) but you are trying to find why and how did this happen [for example, by using reason and logic ➡mathematics ➡science ] with an absolute degree of freedom.

Liking vs. Wanting: What does these mean?

February 11, 2014 Off

If you want to see the bottom of the water in a lake from above, the water has to be quite. If the water is turbulent, you can't. If the water has lots of objects, you can't. If the water has any color or turbidity, you can't. It has to be absolutely clear and quite in order to see the bottom best. Anything you do to this water, it will just add extra noise and turbulence. You can not make a turbulent water quite by doing something. Anything you do will go against your goal. You have to learn the technique of letting it just be and wait. Only then it can quite itself so that you can watch what it is.

With this background, now we have to find the best thing to experiment or examine in order to examine the reality. What is the best thing in the universe to examine. There are multitude of options. Atom, subatomic particles, energies, lights or other electromagnetic radiations, elements, molecules, planets, stars, galaxies, minerals, water, seas, plants, animals, man, mind and spirit. Among all of theses what has everything in it? The best candidate is us, the human. What is the most complicated physical structure know to exist in the universe? It's the human brain. What is the most powerful instrument known to exist in the universe? It's human thought and power of imagination. What is most accessible to us? It is again us, the human. Thus the best object in the known universe you can examine and assess is your own body and mind. It is you. Man is the famous allegorical "microcosm" of the "macrocosm" or the whole universe. If you know yourself and know how your body and mind operates and why does it operate the way it does, you will get closer to real mystery of existence. Hence the wise saying goes "Know Thyself". Given you have done your homework and had your thought honed and trained [see the "How valid is your thinking" essay], the universe will open up and reveal its mystery to you. This "you" is not a special you. Anybody who genuinely undertake the quest, will be that "you". In order to understand yourself better, you need to see your inside as clearly as possible. But there is always some noise inside our mind, our thoughts, likings, wantings, opinions, attachments, preference and intellect. All these creates turbulence and obstructing the view to know yourself better. You have to master the techniques to remove all those unoriginal, unnecessary foreign particles to remove turbidity and purify the water of your mind in order to see the beautiful bottom of the Ground.

I will introduce you into the vast universe inside you by giving an example of the source of a common desire. During the process of growing up, all it started from the very first kiss of your mother. You can not remember the kiss, affection and care from your mother during first 6 months of your life but your body and mind still remembers it, although it's not recollectable in your conscious memory. How can you know that your body and mind still has the memory of it? You can find the answer by asking why you want attention, care and support today from your significant others, without any apparent reason. You think you want care and love because you just want it? Think again.We learn things and then forget the learning episode, then that forgotten associative learning becomes our so called "pure" desire. We then believe our desire is genuinely pure, unconditional and not tied with anything. You just want something because you like it or you want it. Oh fool! It is not as simple as you might think. Think again. Think hard. Attention and approval is the prime addiction we have but we do not remember when we got addicted to this attention and approval seeking behavior in first place. Now you know! Although many of the things that we do or want is either because of biologic need or for utilitarian drive but do we do everything for these mundane reason or do we want those for something else? I am not going to give you the answer. You have to find it for yourself.

Poetry - The end of your fear

Off


The end of your fear


From unity came duality,
After the aeons it became anarchy.
Now we are lost in the details,
And the disharmony prevails.

Did you ever ask?
What is the meaning of this task? 
Why did the wise allowed such?
Why there is suffering so much?

Without finding the answer
You cannot cure this cancer.
The more you try to find,
It always stayed one step behind.

Without us he still has everything,
Then why he bothered it to bring.
Such a creature who finds meaning,
Behind everything except for this yearning.

Behind the noise of chaos,
Why I can still feel the logos.
That is the question of the time,
And that makes the human mind sublime.

But The Wise knows it the best,
One day only some will pass the test.
Not those who have decided,
But those, who have submitted.

Empty your thought and listen to the music,
Everything is singing and dancing, except you weak!
Don't think logic will take you anywhere,
It's an inferior creation, be aware!

It takes a lot of courage,
If you want to see his visage.
He showed himself only to those who surrender,
And then you will see his magnificent splendor.

Hiding just behind you as a great unbiased teacher, 
Always supported you as his beloved creature.
Waiting for aeons for you, but you never realized,
And you were looking for him too but got paralyzed.

Look hard, look until you find,
When you find it, you'll see it was always entwined.
You can not believe it, is this so simple!
Oh Fool me! you smile with a dimple!

You have no more questions unanswered,
Everything becomes One, you again feel pampered.
Whatever you do, do it as prayer
Savor the time, love the world, and end your fear.

Poetry

Off



What is a sin?


Misuse of intellect,
Duality based artifact.

Things that distort,
And when you forcefully extort.

We are all sinners in one sense or another,
But the real sin is misusing your power.

The sheep repents for their sins,
The Master repents for not recognizing their twins.

How valid is your thinking that came out of this cosmos?

February 10, 2014 Category : Off

The constituents that made our body is not the exceptions to the nature. Our body is roughly made of, in the same proportion what is available in the universe. For example, Hydrogen, Oxygen, Nitrogen, Carbon these are all commonly found elements in the earth, stars and the universe in general. Thus the compounds that made our body is not the exception to this universe, rather than the usual and expected one. Just like our body came out of the matter in the cosmos, our mind evolved from the physical interactions of those particles and masses. Just like the irregularities of some mass does not mean that we cannot examine the original general properties of the mass and that general properties are not valid. Similarly, just because our thinking can be apparently erroneous sometimes, does not mean that rational, pure, educated, dispassionate thinking process and highly sophisticated intuition is not as valid as science. The only Achilles heel here is to find a valid starting point for the thinking and asking the right questions from that ground (see "reason and intuition" essay). Off course, meanwhile, in order to check how good is your thinking and how well aligned is your thought with the world, you can formulate some hypothesis about some issues for practice without prior knowledge about the outcome and find the data or check the results afterwards to see how well was your thought in recognizing the truth without prior empirical evidence. If you can formulate hypothesis in many different situations based on literature reviews and information available, and find that you accurately predicted the results which you find later to be true then its a good news and your thought is getting trained in right direction. Let's analyze the situation. I am just mentioning the major contributors [ignoring infinity many others for the sake of simplicity]. For example, what is the probability of your existence by random chance in the whole universe? What is the probability of your thinking the way you are doing? What is the probability that some other person with whom you are not connected in thought or time or culture in any conceivable way is also thinking exactly the same conclusion (remember the phrase "wise men think alike"?) and in retrospect you both found out that whatever you guys thought is actually the case confirmed later by empirical data. Now calculate the joint probability of those unimaginably tiny events together. I can use some variables, coefficients and fancy looking equations to look impressive but I will not, because that's not the the point. Even just conceptionally, you can see that you can be as certain as the size universe, if not more. Theoretically, it's bigger than Graham's number when you take all variables in consideration. When you can come to this level repeatedly, then you can put more weight on your own thoughts. Otherwise keep working on your thought training. If you miss, then you have to carefully dissect the whole scenario. You have to find the reason of your wrong conclusion. Is it faulty reasoning or false appreciation of the background information or literature? In what step you missed it? Was it preventable? In what ways? By more meticulous thinking or more data collection or background reading? Was there any problem in the reference material? Was it incomplete? How and where can you have more reliable information? Can you ever get a completely reliable information or literature? You can not typically find these answer from a single source. You have to read extensively from multiple primary documents. Additionally, you have to read the background of the paper like the biography of the author, philosophy of that author, geopolitical and social melieu of that time etc. Not the least, you have to also read between lines. Yes, thought training is that hard and believe me, it still worth it because the reward is bigger than you ever imagined. We are designed to think, remember?

In order to understand hydrogen or heat you don't have to go to and experiment with sun. You can still examine hydrogen and heat found here on earth, even in our body. They are perfectly aligned under the same physical laws. Similarly, we don't have to find an ultra intelligent beings or authorities out there to validate our intuition and thinking process. Its already aligned with the underlying Cosmos's principle if done properly because our true self represents this Cosmos. In fact, our unconscious part has the latent memories of cosmos. I am aware of the fact that our thinking or intuition can lead to awry but like anomalies or irregularities in physical worlds, they are not the most common variety. Even in presence of anomaly and using intuition as the ground for science, science typically is unwilling to accept anything mere intuitive, no matter how genuine they are, unless 'falsified by empirical paradigm". Rather they reject those ideas as a walking dead philosopher's babel and figments of imagination.We should not be dissuaded by these unfortunate scientific dogmas and the anomalies. Sometimes anomalies are the first pointer of some underlying profound laws. Just like anomalies in material or physical world are the exceptions, so does fallacy of thinking. In the same line of reasoning, cognitive biases are the exceptions and luckily can be recognized and eliminated by proper thought trainings. Most of the cognitive fallacy comes from your emotional or personal pre-preference, your past experience or biases. Alternatively, it can be due to incorrect starting assumptions. Most of the time, especially when done carefully, sincerely, honestly, with a completely detached meditation, our thinking is perfectly aligned to principle of cosmos. So don't be shy in using your intuition and thought. Don't listen to those scientist who will reject any idea born in your rational mind as figment of imagination unless "falsifiable by empirical evidence". You can rely on you, your thought and enjoy the journey.

Copyrighted © By ZeroDivided.1.0@gmail.com | 2012-*. Powered by Blogger.