Home > Self-Delusion

Self-Delusion

Mind Without a Body is Dangerously Delusional

March 16, 2015 Category : , , , , Off

Without a body, a mind, (if it is a mind at all) and hypothetically if such “body independent mind” exist, by our realm's definition, is blind, directionless, “smoky” and very prone to be delusional. These hypothetical “minds” include but not limited to, which a man can imagine are the following: mind of the 1) the dreams, 2) deeply unconscious, 3) “out of the body experience” induced by meditations, psychoactive drugs, brain pathologies (epilepsy, strokes etc.) or extreme stress, such as near death experiences 4) collective unconscious (of Jung), or the repressed mind (of Freud), 5) third eye ( of new age), 6) the “heart’s mind” 7) spirit’s mind as envisioned by occultist/alchemist 8) divine mind or soul’s mind of religions, 9) kundalini or tantric mind (of Shiva), 10) mind of Ein Sof. To illustrate the concept you can imagine the following: How many times you had a dream (out of all the dreams that ever had) of which you are completely satisfied with its nature, content, as well as its interpretation and you had a full dose of certainty or “highs” that you can get by doing the same thing in real life? Dreams are vague, inconsistent, self-contradictory, and distorted in terms of natural laws. You cannot have a concrete interpretations out of your dreams to confirm or disconfirm anything. You have only smoky, vague ideas while you are dreaming, but once you are awake, only then you can have a better and concrete ideas about those dreams and their meanings, if there are any. You often need a “professional” dream (pseudo)interpreter to give you a concocted interpretation, which are often a sort of fairy tales that typically incorporates repressed sexuality or fear theories as prescribed by their masters. The bottom line is the fact that your dreams are still tied to your brain, which is still a material, although not fully functional. Now imagine, what will your dream look like, if it is not tied to with any material objects at all, whatsoever. It will be so meaningless (if not horrible) and chaotic that we cannot even imagine it (fortunately). The function of the body and the brain is to eliminate all those delusions and vague dreamlike imageries, except the one, which is a consistent, reliable, reproducible and accurate i.e. a true representation of the reality while you are awake. Your body and brain is a device to pave the way for making the reason to emerge to eradicate the delusions. Only that reason has any hope to offer you any certainty or knowledge and hence peace (or in religious terms, salvation).

Although the source of our knowledge classically categorized as “The Four Ways”, it does not mean that there is only 4 ways of knowledge. But for the purpose of this essay, I will stick with the classicist and that will suffice for now. 1). Sensory perceptions (empiricist), 2). Reason or intellect (rationalist), 3). Intuitive understanding (Idealist) and 4) Revelations (Prophets). Although the original masters never saw any reason to separate the ways you can have a knowledge, but now the existence of those distinct groups only suggests that they failed to see that all four are interconnected and different gradations, originated from the same source, stating from most concrete (the sensory perception) to most abstract (revelation). The first reaction to this statement is the utter denial from the rationalist (because they do not have the equipments to see the connection between reason and sensory perceptions*, see footnote below), from the empiricist (who cannot see the connection between observation or sensory perception and intuition), from the idealist (who cannot see the interdependence of matter and the ideas) and from a theologian (who cannot see the connection between reason, or sensory perception with revelation). Finally, the existentialist or absurdities will deny everything altogether, without giving any clues. But just like a heroin addicted person is in denial that they have an addiction problem, which is obvious to those who are not addicted, I understand the cause of such denial ( i.e. not using the tools correctly that they already have) and will proceed anyway. 

Material objects are a recorder or depository of information. Similarly, your body is a recorder of information that actually happens within it and outside it, not just possible information in “phase-space” field. Body contains what is true out of all delusional ideas that can exist in bodiless mind (see the list above). Body is the witness of Truth. Without the body, mind has a tendency to be delusional, just like the water tends to be shapeless without a grail. Body gives the mind a shape (platonic forms or ideals). And the body and the information it contains are reliable, reproducible, and accurate, but extracting the information is not necessarily easy. The birth of reason (the ability to see the truth out all many scenarios given) is tied to body. Without a body, no reason exists in this world. Without the reason, there is no way to be sure of anything. Without certainty, there is no peace and no happiness in anybody’s mind. How can you see that the reason that you already see existent is tied to your body? This is subtle and often difficult to see unless you have developed a keen perception. How can you see the way by which reason emerges from the body? When you start to observe yourself while you are doing something such as trials and errors. What you call a “cultivated reason” is actually a derivative of your own observation of the outcomes of trials and errors, but those trials and errors are not a formal experiments or experiences hence would have been easily gone unnoticed and forgotten, unless you are not really observant. Your observation power grows when you did something, but that did not work as you wanted to be and now thinking what exactly went wrong. You try it next time more sincerely and more carefully and this time, your are more observant of yourself and started to notice the relations between your actions and your reasoning power. This way, throughout the history, it has been suggested that only a virtuous life can make you happy because with all those actions, your are learning the fact that your body's action is the source of your reason and that opens the door to the next level that has far bigger and grand consequence than you had ever imagined. If you continue your journey and learn from your body, you will see that your body is the source of ALL KNOWLEDGE including revelation, although it comes much later, if ever, and unfortunately, most people, cannot even see the necessary and sufficient connection between sensory perception and reason, including the "elites" such as Hume, Kant etc. Once you started to see those connections learnt from your VIRTUOUS acts, you start to appreciate why your body is your only assets and why you have decided to give up all of your powers for the sake to have a body in order to avoid the inherent tendency of bodiless mind's confused delusions and/or uncertainty and to enjoy the certainty offered by carnality.

Footnotes:
*Reason is a form of semantic memory that is transformed from the episodic memories (failure to see the connections is due to amnesia or blindness or ignorance of that transformative linkage) . The episodic memory is in turn transformed sensory perceptions with innumerable repetition from the sensory organs. You will not and cannot accept this because your mind is not calm and perceptive enough to see the subtle link. But if you focus and sharpen your mind (with discipline), you will begin to see it, only when your mind is free from contaminations. What is a contamination? That which is not real or genuine or original. Where does those contamination come from? From your choice of not doing the right things (failure to hold fast on the smaller truths) and not abstaining from harmful things. In simple words, you have to be "bible good" in order to get rid of those contaminants. Only then you can see the clear linkage and more deeper truths afterwards.

Who am I?

July 23, 2014 Category : , , , Off

Who am I?
How am I be who I am?
Why am I be who I am?

These questions are the traditional eternal questions that mankind has been thinking and pondering with. Among these, people are more interested to find the answer to the first one because that seems to be the most critical and of immediate relevance. "Who am I" seems to be the easiest one to answer and pretty straight forward. Are you sure? Just because you say so? Do you have any proof? No, because you don't need any proof for that kind of stupid, lame and commonsensical questions. But this "common sense" does not in any "sense" necessarily true. Then how you know who you really are? You don't, at least yet. So, is this most accessible and easy looking question in fact improvable and has to be taken as given? If yes, then again you are believing in something without any personal experience and validation. Believing in something without knowing the how and why, leads to rely on "hope", with the hope that you are somehow right. Indeed, it is just a hope, that you wish to come true, but you are not sure. This is why you are hoping on your belief in first place. This wishful thinking and hope leads to misery as hope was depicted as the evil that stays inside the Pandora's box to torment you eternally, hoping that "hope" will come out one day, but it never shows up and continues to be the source of misery!

So the first question does not have an answer, as of yet and it is not answerable unless you have the answer to the remaining Dyad of the Triad of the inquiry. Without the latter Dyad, the First is blind. If you have answer to the First without the answer to the Dyad then how can you be sure that whatever or whoever you think yourself is not a delusion, illusion, paranoia, dissociated identity disorder, split (schizo) personality (phrenia), multiple personality disorder, confabulation, false memories or an amnestics disorder? Scary, right? This is the danger of labeling yourself who you are just by your gut feelings/intuition, your emotional attachment and personal preference. Additionally, your answer to the first question can and have been molded and remolded by the society, culture, family, peer pressure, indoctrination from schools and disinformation propagated from mass media. Even worst, Gurus from the east are willing to give you a 'ready-made' answer to the first question based on your spiritual taste and need, but only in exchange of a hefty fee or donation to the "poor".

By this time it should be clearer and clearer to you that the first and most critical question of the Triad is not answerable at all by itself and in fact it is dangerous and misleading to try to have answer only that question in isolation. You better focus on the latter Dyad to find the First. If I give you the answer to the latter two questions then it is not your own and you will not have a complete satisfaction with those answers. You will become just another follower or disciple of the teacher. In order to become a true self-created Master (rather than a disciple) you have find answers of the all 3 of the grand Triad by a healthy combination of observation, experimentation, reason, intuition and imagination. All of these can be reduced to just one single trait- "be perceptive" about what's going on. This is the prime goal of life itself. Without any solution to the Triad, no pleasure is worth experiencing. But with the (dis)solution to the Triad, even simple thing becomes a sublime pleasurable experience! Life is short and there is no time to waste. So, seek.

What is Justice?

July 18, 2014 Category : , , , , Off

From the beginning of this universe, asymmetry is in action. Even the causal factor for "this" universe to exist in first place is the asymmetry. The primordial asymmetry is still extant today like Male vs. Female, preference to Good vs. Bad etc. For this ever active asymmetry, the real justice in this world is that there cannot be a justice, because every human is unique and hence unequal in traits and abilities but everyone can still have the option to be equal [or even superior!] and have the will power to use the excuse of equality to be treated equal (although they themselves know that they are not equal). The apparently separate "things" in this world are not equal of each other. The delusion of justice (of Plato) arises out of amnesia of intellectual chain of thoughts. At the core, when they go there or consider the issue of justice, they can see easily and clearly that they always give their own preference over other people's interest but when they move down the chain of thought at the surface, the forgot about what they wanted at the core and now want equality for everyone, which is by its very nature, unattainable. Because of those 'honest' hypocrisy, justice is and always will be an abstract but unrealistic concept. 

Politicians always used the trump card of equality to get the favor of the mass but they themselves know that equality is not possible. For the sake of example, let's consider the supposed Utopia of Thomas More. Given all your needs fulfilled, it was thought that finally the politicians will achieve harmony and there will not be any dissatisfaction among citizens. But at the very core there is a hidden seed of asymmetric want that human have that cannot be systematized. This can be illustrated by the male and female relationships. When 2 men genuinely want the same women, the all the ideals of equality breaks down. The table of life or the universe in general is tilted. The creation itself was not made equally. That grand inequality still has its imprint on today's society and men. So forget about mass and generalized justice and focus on what is just only for you in your context. This is the only justice that is just. If you are really respectful to others and want justice for others then doing just thing for your own life and with your immediate significant others which can and will bring justice to others. Do not self delude yourself on mass justice like Socrates, Plato or most of the other revolutionaries who still dream today to be fulfilled. This is no way of saying that I am against the concept of justice per se. This essay is just to point out that universal justice is not possible but the honest attempt for it should always be tried. It is good for the society [especially for the Gentile and the Meek] in general but when you see it has failed to achieve a complete success, please do not be disturbed and pessimistic. That is the nature of the nature. Get used to it!

Copyrighted © By ZeroDivided.1.0@gmail.com | 2012-*. Powered by Blogger.