Poem: To speak or not to speak

November 2, 2021 Category : Off

 A short poem, dedicated to any fellow seekers.

Title of the Poem:
To speak or not to speak:

They say.. those who speak, do not know,
Those who know, do not speak!
I give no heed in either critique,
Just decided, I am free to speak.

The speaker of the truth doesn't care if you accept it or not,
The listener ought to see who knows and who does not!
Once recognized, then Truth will descend upon you,
It will show you the ways that you had no clue.

It will make you proud yet humble,
From that point, you start feeling the ineffable!
Then cycle again starts,
If you want, you can speak again from hearts!

Many will reject, some will attack and some will laugh,
But a few will see the truth and keep it alive on your behalf.
It is not your job to win over people nor to make them adhere,
Rather, Sing the Truth out for those with ears to hear!

English can be a deceiving language!

October 2, 2021 Category : Off

ইংরেজি (বা অন্য কোন ভাষা) হতে পারে খুব প্রতারণামূলক ভাষা!
কেন?
1. ইংরেজি একটি পরিকল্পিত এবং সিন্থেটিক ভাষা (বেশিরভাগ জার্মানিক এবং পরে ইন্দো-ইউরোপীয় শিকড় থেকে ধার করা)
2. একই ধারণা প্রকাশ করার জন্য অনেকগুলি ভিন্ন শব্দ বিদ্যমান। তারপর এটি অনুরূপ শব্দ প্রকাশ করতে অস্বীকার করে এবং এটি কৃত্রিমভাবে জটিল করে তোলে।
3. বিজ্ঞানী বা শিক্ষাবিদদের দ্বারা চুরির অভিযোগ এড়াতে জটিল শব্দ সৃষ্টি করার অভ্যাস।
4. সব কিছুর নাম দেওয়া এবং এটিকে গুরুনিহিত অর্থকে নষ্ট করা, (এমনকি কিছু পবিত্র বা গুরুতর ধারণাও)।
5. ইংরেজি একটি নতুন ভাষা তবে এখন অন্য ভাষার কর্তৃত্ব দাবি করছে।
6. ইংরেজী হল ব্যাবলের টাওয়ার। বিদ্বেষপূর্ণভাবে এর ধ্বংসএর মধ্যে ইতিমধ্যেই অন্তর্ভুক্ত রয়েছে।
7. মানুষকে নিয়ন্ত্রণ করার জন্য শব্দ ব্যবহার করা যেতে পারে, এবং সম্পূর্ণ "রাজনৈতিক সঠিকতা" আসলে "শব্দের অত্যাচার" এর মাধ্যমে মানুষের মনকে নিয়ন্ত্রণ এবং নিপীড়ন করা
English (or any other language) can be a very deceiving language!
Why?
1. English is a Designed and Synthetic Language (borrowed mostly from Germanic and later Indo-European Roots)
2. Many different words exist to express the same concept. Then it steadfastly refuses to express the same meaning with similar words and makes it artificially complicated.
3. Complicating paraphrasing to avoid plagiarism by the scientist or academicians.
4. Name everything and make it banal, even to some sacred or serious concepts.
5. English is a newer if not the newest member of the family of languages but now claiming the authority of the other language against which another language to be interpreted.
6. English is the Tower of Babel. Paradoxically the destruction (loss of meaning) of it is embedded in it already.
7. Words can be used to control people, and the entire "political correctness" is actually to control and oppress people's minds through "tyranny of words"

There are four types of enlightenment

April 1, 2021 Off

চার প্রকারের বোধোদয় [enlightenment]। (original English version below)
১। আপনি প্রমাণের ভিত্তিতে তথ্য এবং সত্য খুঁজছেন। আপনার প্রাথমিক অনুভূতি আপনাকে বলে যে আমরা যা দেখছি তার পিছনে একটি কারণগত প্রয়োজন থাকতে পারে যা ঐতিহ্যগতভাবে ধর্ম বা ধর্মতত্ত্বের অধীনে ছিল। কিন্তু যখন আপনি ধর্মের নামে ভোগান্তি, প্রতারণা, অবিচার দেখেন তখন নিজেই সবকিছু পরীক্ষা করতে চান। যখন আপনি সত্যিই নিশ্চিত হন যে সেখানে কোন স্রষ্টা নেই, এবং আপনি যে জগতে বাস করছেন তা কেবল উদ্দেশ্যহীন কারণ আপনি মনে করেন যে আপনি সবকিছু খতিয়ে দেখেছেন এবং পরীক্ষা করেছেন এবং নিশ্চিত যে আপনি একটি স্রষ্টাহীন জগতে বসবাস করছেন [হার্ড নাস্তিক] - উদাহরণ: "মহাবিশ্ব যত বোধগম্য বলে মনে হয়, এটিকে ততো অর্থহীনও মনে হয় " - পদার্থবিজ্ঞানে নোবেল বিজয়ী - স্টিভেন ওয়েইনবার্গ। [ধর্মনিরপেক্ষ/নাস্তিক বোধোদয়] = কোন স্রষ্টা আসলে নেই!
২। যখন আপনি মনে করেন যে একজন স্রষ্টা আছেন কিন্তু তিনি সম্পূর্ণরূপে অদৃশ্য এবং অজানা। তিনি এই পৃথিবীর কর্মকাণ্ডে হস্তক্ষেপ করেন না এবং আমরা মানুষেরা এর একটি অংশ মাত্র। হার্ড রক বটম [অগ্নিস্টিকস /ডাইষ্ট এনলাইটেনমেন্ট]। = স্রষ্টা থাকতে পারেন, কিন্তু তাকে জানার উপায় নেই।
৩। যখন আপনি মনে করেন যে একজন স্রষ্টা আছে এবং সেই স্রষ্টা বুদ্ধি এবং আবেগ সহ একজন ব্যক্তির মতো একটি বাস্তব সত্তা কিন্তু তিনি একটি ভিন্ন জগতে বসবাস করেন যা আমরা স্বর্গ নামে চিনি । মানুষ শুধুই তার আনন্দের এবং এবাদতের জন্য সৃষ্টি। সুতরাং আমাদের কাজ হল তাঁর নির্দেশ এবং আদেশ অনুসরণ করা কারণ আমরা বিশ্বাস করি যে এই ধরনের একজন স্রষ্টা আসল এবং আমরা কেবল তার সৃষ্টি [ধর্মীয় বোধোদয় বা প্রফ্রেথহুড]। = একজন স্রষ্টা আছেন এবং এখানে তিনি আমাকে আপনার জন্য যা বলেছেন তা হল এখানে লেখা।
4. যখন আপনি মনে করেন যে একজন স্রষ্টা আছেন এবং স্রষ্টা এই পৃথিবীতেও বিরাজমান কিন্তু স্পষ্ট দৃষ্টিতে লুকানো যা মৃত্যুর করনে বাধাগ্রস্ত হয়। তবে পুনরাবৃত্তিমূলক চক্রের মাধ্যমে মৃত্যু এবং পুনরুত্থান এবং আপনি এই পদক্ষেপ (মৃত্যু) এর অর্থ এবং উদ্দেশ্য বুঝতে পারেন এবং একই স্রষ্টা খুঁজে পান যিনি আগে লুকিয়ে ছিলেন, এখন স্পষ্টভাবে দৃশ্যমান। আপনি নিশ্চিত হয়ে উঠবেন এবং আর বিভ্রান্তি বা উদ্বেগ থাকবে না। [নন-ডিনোমিনোশনাল মিস্টিক এনলাইটেনমেন্ট]। = এই স্রষ্টা ছাড়া অন্য কোন স্রষ্টা নেই!
পাদটীকা:
দয়া করে মনে রাখবেন, বিরল পরিস্থিতিতে, একজন ব্যক্তিকে একই সাথে একাধিক বিভাগের মধ্যে পাওয়া যেতে পারে।
There are four types of enlightenment.
1. You are looking for truth and fact-based evidence. Your initial gut feeling tells you that there might be a causal necessity behind everything we are seeing that was traditionally regarding under the domain of religion or theology. But when you see sufferings, deceptions, injustice in the name of religion and wanted to examine everything by yourself. In this exploration, when you are really sure that there's no God out there, and the world you are living in is simply directionless and purposeless [no teleology] because you think you have seen and examined everything and you are living in a Godless world [Hard Atheist] - Example: "The more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it also seems pointless" -Nobel laureate in Physics - Steven Weinberg. [Secular/Atheist Enlightenment]. = There is No God!
2. When you think that there is a God but he is completely transcendent and unknowable. He doesn't interfere with the world we are living in, and we human beings are just part of it. There is Hard Rock Bottom [Agnostics /Deist [similar to Buddhist] Enlightenment]. = God might Exist, but he is not knowable.
3. When you think there is a God and that God is a real entity like a person with intelligence and emotions but he lives in a different world traditionally known as heaven. Human beings are just his creation for pleasure. So our job is to follow his instruction and command because of our confidence that such a God is real and we are just his creation [Religious Enlightenment or Prophethoods]. = There is a God and here is what he has told me for you to do.
4. When you think there is a God and the God resides also in this world but the hidden in plain sight which is obstructed by the interruption of Death. However, by repetitive cycle Death and Resurrection, you came to understand the meaning and the purpose of this step (Death) and find the same GOD who was previously hidden, now clearly visible in plain sight. You become sure and no more confusion or anxiety. [Non-Denominational Mystic Enlightenment]. = There is No God, but God!
Footnote:
1. This essay is not intended to hurt anyone's feelings but centered around the core idea of "Enlightenment". It is not about if any of those categories are better than others or not. And also not about the utility and benefit of any of the 4 types of "Enlightenment".
2. Please note, in rare circumstances, one single person can be simultaneously described by multiple categories.
3. There is a difference between specific and generalization. We do not know what Time actually is but we can understand there is an overall flow of things. Even though we do not understand even a simple proton, but we are using it all the time. Just because we do not understand the first nanosecond of Bigbang, it would not prevent us to generalize that we exist today and we did not exist at some point in time, so must have come from somewhere, presumably Bigbang. This is system-level understanding, rather than specific-level understanding. The literature around Enlightenment is never around specifics, but a rather system-level generalization. Some people actually don't believe there is any such thing called Enlightenment, but I give the name "Secular/Atheist Enlightenment" anyway just for the sake of discussion.

CrossRef:
http://this-is-what-you-ve-been-looking-for.blogspot.com/2014/02/where-are-you-in-cycle.html








Surrender !

July 23, 2020 Off

Surrender Levels

Level 1
Premature Surrender - Unexamined
Vs
Level 2
Surrender - Incompletely Examined
Vs
Level 3
Surrender - Examination interrupted by Fear or felling of inadequate time and opportunity
Vs
Level 4
Surrender - Opportunistic, and Intermittent. Multiple Surrender when the time is right or difficult.
Vs
Level 5
Surrender - Cost-Effective - Intentional Delayed Surrender
vs
Level 6
Surrender until the last resource/breath has been used (Example, Jacob's way, i.e never surrender)
Vs
Level 7
Surrender at the cost of utilizing or using the last breath.

Trisduction, Orthotrisduction and Orthoretrotrisduction [OR -Trisduction]

April 20, 2019 Off

Trisduction: Union of Tree Paths.

Each Path or Line is a Statement on a Matter of Fact [Analytic or Empirical]

Each Path is Absolutely Independent of  Each other [Perhaps only one common ground is possible] and hence oriented orthogonally [at right angle] to each other.

There can be only only 3 such duction in the world that we are sure to exist in Reality.

Formulate 3 such statements and them meditate [perhaps will take years] to see can you find the precious union point.

This is the method of  Trisduction.

More to come...

The Paradox of Fear and Wisdom

April 2, 2015 Category : , , , , Off

Fear makes you blind.
Fear makes you impulsive.
Fear prevents you from thinking logically (or thinking straight).

Off course fear is also protecting you from potential dangers such as of a lion or snake. But those fears are not uniques to human but rather almost universal in animal kingdom. The unique thing for the human is the reason and if you consider yourself wiser than other animals, you have to give credit to your reasoning power over your fears. Or worse, the same fear, if unfounded, will makes you a pathologic case of phobic disorders, instead of solving your problems. You suffer even more by the fear of the fears (phobophobia)! Fear is the exact antithesis of wisdom but paradoxically fear of god was also prescribed by the original authorities as the real wisdom.

How can that be?

Whenever you see a paradox in a sentence, it usually means the sentence is either censored off the critical part or the sentence is not complete. The paradox no longer exist if you know the bigger picture or context, in other words if you see the full sentence (instead of paradoxic fragments). How can there be a situation, where fear is both antithesis* and yet the path** towards wisdom? What are the missing parts of the sentence? Can you see it?

The mother of all fears is DEATH and your inability to control it. Fear of death make you enjoy the life as much as you can (even at the cost of other people's suffering) because life is short and YOLO. Fear of death makes you to conserve time and become efficient. Fear of death makes you to look for shortcuts and loopholes to bypass the obstacles, instead of dealing with issues sincerely. Fear of death makes you insecure and you seek security by marriage (either for partner's support or for a baby as future generation because you know you will not live or be healthy forever), friendship, or property. Fear (biggest fear of all is death) is driving your life, whether you acknowledge it or not. Unless you recognize this, fear will dominate your life, and you will be far away from wisdom.

When a religious preacher bases his argument by intimidating of, or by invoking death / eternal hell, and consequently, if the listener formulates his worldview based only on the fear of death as a model of achieving "true wisdom", they fail to see the other half of it (where fear is antithesis of wisdom) and missing the full picture. They are missing the equally crucial other half (not to fear in pursuit of the Truth). On the contrary, if you based your theology purely based on reason (before you achieved wisdom), it will take you no where and you will be thrown into a full blown existential/nihilistic crisis from you might never recover!

Half of anything cannot be the whole and fear (or death) based theology is bound to be lame and blind, unless you simultaneously see the reason NOT to be fearful in pursuit of the Truth. Only then, these two will complement each other to make the fragmented part into One complete worldview and the paradox will disappear between reason (based on wisdom) vs. faith (based on fear).

Mind Without a Body is Dangerously Delusional

March 16, 2015 Category : , , , , Off

Without a body, a mind, (if it is a mind at all) and hypothetically if such “body independent mind” exist, by our realm's definition, is blind, directionless, “smoky” and very prone to be delusional. These hypothetical “minds” include but not limited to, which a man can imagine are the following: mind of the 1) the dreams, 2) deeply unconscious, 3) “out of the body experience” induced by meditations, psychoactive drugs, brain pathologies (epilepsy, strokes etc.) or extreme stress, such as near death experiences 4) collective unconscious (of Jung), or the repressed mind (of Freud), 5) third eye ( of new age), 6) the “heart’s mind” 7) spirit’s mind as envisioned by occultist/alchemist 8) divine mind or soul’s mind of religions, 9) kundalini or tantric mind (of Shiva), 10) mind of Ein Sof. To illustrate the concept you can imagine the following: How many times you had a dream (out of all the dreams that ever had) of which you are completely satisfied with its nature, content, as well as its interpretation and you had a full dose of certainty or “highs” that you can get by doing the same thing in real life? Dreams are vague, inconsistent, self-contradictory, and distorted in terms of natural laws. You cannot have a concrete interpretations out of your dreams to confirm or disconfirm anything. You have only smoky, vague ideas while you are dreaming, but once you are awake, only then you can have a better and concrete ideas about those dreams and their meanings, if there are any. You often need a “professional” dream (pseudo)interpreter to give you a concocted interpretation, which are often a sort of fairy tales that typically incorporates repressed sexuality or fear theories as prescribed by their masters. The bottom line is the fact that your dreams are still tied to your brain, which is still a material, although not fully functional. Now imagine, what will your dream look like, if it is not tied to with any material objects at all, whatsoever. It will be so meaningless (if not horrible) and chaotic that we cannot even imagine it (fortunately). The function of the body and the brain is to eliminate all those delusions and vague dreamlike imageries, except the one, which is a consistent, reliable, reproducible and accurate i.e. a true representation of the reality while you are awake. Your body and brain is a device to pave the way for making the reason to emerge to eradicate the delusions. Only that reason has any hope to offer you any certainty or knowledge and hence peace (or in religious terms, salvation).

Although the source of our knowledge classically categorized as “The Four Ways”, it does not mean that there is only 4 ways of knowledge. But for the purpose of this essay, I will stick with the classicist and that will suffice for now. 1). Sensory perceptions (empiricist), 2). Reason or intellect (rationalist), 3). Intuitive understanding (Idealist) and 4) Revelations (Prophets). Although the original masters never saw any reason to separate the ways you can have a knowledge, but now the existence of those distinct groups only suggests that they failed to see that all four are interconnected and different gradations, originated from the same source, stating from most concrete (the sensory perception) to most abstract (revelation). The first reaction to this statement is the utter denial from the rationalist (because they do not have the equipments to see the connection between reason and sensory perceptions*, see footnote below), from the empiricist (who cannot see the connection between observation or sensory perception and intuition), from the idealist (who cannot see the interdependence of matter and the ideas) and from a theologian (who cannot see the connection between reason, or sensory perception with revelation). Finally, the existentialist or absurdities will deny everything altogether, without giving any clues. But just like a heroin addicted person is in denial that they have an addiction problem, which is obvious to those who are not addicted, I understand the cause of such denial ( i.e. not using the tools correctly that they already have) and will proceed anyway. 

Material objects are a recorder or depository of information. Similarly, your body is a recorder of information that actually happens within it and outside it, not just possible information in “phase-space” field. Body contains what is true out of all delusional ideas that can exist in bodiless mind (see the list above). Body is the witness of Truth. Without the body, mind has a tendency to be delusional, just like the water tends to be shapeless without a grail. Body gives the mind a shape (platonic forms or ideals). And the body and the information it contains are reliable, reproducible, and accurate, but extracting the information is not necessarily easy. The birth of reason (the ability to see the truth out all many scenarios given) is tied to body. Without a body, no reason exists in this world. Without the reason, there is no way to be sure of anything. Without certainty, there is no peace and no happiness in anybody’s mind. How can you see that the reason that you already see existent is tied to your body? This is subtle and often difficult to see unless you have developed a keen perception. How can you see the way by which reason emerges from the body? When you start to observe yourself while you are doing something such as trials and errors. What you call a “cultivated reason” is actually a derivative of your own observation of the outcomes of trials and errors, but those trials and errors are not a formal experiments or experiences hence would have been easily gone unnoticed and forgotten, unless you are not really observant. Your observation power grows when you did something, but that did not work as you wanted to be and now thinking what exactly went wrong. You try it next time more sincerely and more carefully and this time, your are more observant of yourself and started to notice the relations between your actions and your reasoning power. This way, throughout the history, it has been suggested that only a virtuous life can make you happy because with all those actions, your are learning the fact that your body's action is the source of your reason and that opens the door to the next level that has far bigger and grand consequence than you had ever imagined. If you continue your journey and learn from your body, you will see that your body is the source of ALL KNOWLEDGE including revelation, although it comes much later, if ever, and unfortunately, most people, cannot even see the necessary and sufficient connection between sensory perception and reason, including the "elites" such as Hume, Kant etc. Once you started to see those connections learnt from your VIRTUOUS acts, you start to appreciate why your body is your only assets and why you have decided to give up all of your powers for the sake to have a body in order to avoid the inherent tendency of bodiless mind's confused delusions and/or uncertainty and to enjoy the certainty offered by carnality.

Footnotes:
*Reason is a form of semantic memory that is transformed from the episodic memories (failure to see the connections is due to amnesia or blindness or ignorance of that transformative linkage) . The episodic memory is in turn transformed sensory perceptions with innumerable repetition from the sensory organs. You will not and cannot accept this because your mind is not calm and perceptive enough to see the subtle link. But if you focus and sharpen your mind (with discipline), you will begin to see it, only when your mind is free from contaminations. What is a contamination? That which is not real or genuine or original. Where does those contamination come from? From your choice of not doing the right things (failure to hold fast on the smaller truths) and not abstaining from harmful things. In simple words, you have to be "bible good" in order to get rid of those contaminants. Only then you can see the clear linkage and more deeper truths afterwards.

Copyrighted © By ZeroDivided.1.0@gmail.com | 2012-*. Powered by Blogger.